|
Post by al on Sept 1, 2010 21:54:24 GMT 1
Basic proportions of the carriage were obtained by measuring (1) the distance from the trunnion to the base ring of the gun (2) the diameter of the base ring, and (3) the diameter of the second reinforce ring. The result was a quadrilateral figure that served as a key in laying out the carriage to fit the gun. Cheeks or side plates, of the carriage were a caliber in thickness, so the bigger the gun, the more massive the mount. A 24 pounder cheek , for example, would be made of timber 6 inches thick. The Spaniards often used mahogany, but at Jamestown in the early 1600's Capt. John Smith reported the mounting of seven "great pieces of ordnance upon new carriages of Cedar " and the French colonials also used Cedar. British specifications in the mid-eighteenth century called for cheeks and transoms of dry Elm, which was very pliable and not likely to split; but some carriages were made of young Oak, and Oak was standard for united states garrison carriages until it was eventually replaced by wrought iron after the civil war.
Artillery. A short illustrated history of cannon, Emphasizing types used in America. United States Department of the Interior, Stewert. L. Udell 1949.
|
|
|
Post by steve stanley on Sept 1, 2010 22:55:40 GMT 1
I've seen various 16/17 cent diagrams that take all the barrel dimensions & use them as a basis for the carriage...didn't realise they were still doing it in the age of enlightenment....
|
|
|
Post by al on Sept 2, 2010 17:53:34 GMT 1
I've seen various 16/17 cent diagrams that take all the barrel dimensions & use them as a basis for the carriage...didn't realise they were still doing it in the age of enlightenment.... Yes i found that interesting as well, armies ( especially the British army ) are notorious for sticking to previous tried and trusted methods and styles of manufacture for items such as artillery, but there does seem to be a suggestion here that there were different styles being used in the colonies from those at home........i suppose there obviously would be.......... Right who wants interesting bits on Naval deck carriages.............just me.....?.........oh well it keeps me busy.
|
|